Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This presentation aims to explore various models and cases of artificial intelligence use in healthc...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...