Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
MODERATED- I’m ok. I can work this out for myself. I’m not like a “real” ...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
MODERATED-Part 2 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
MODERATED-Session 4 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
MODERATED-Part 1 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...