Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...