Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
This presentation aims to explore various models and cases of artificial intelligence use in healthc...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...