Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...