Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...