Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new representation or when they must withdraw from an existing one. This CLE will cover the more complicated conflict of interest scenarios—the so-called “hot potato” doctrine and “thrust-upon” conflicts.
The CLE will describe the critical provisions of Rule 1.7 (current client conflicts) and Rule 1.9 (former client conflicts) as well as common law created doctrines that govern disqualification proceedings. It will conclude by providing practical guidance on how to avoid conflicts and how best to navigate them should they nonetheless arise.
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...