The old tactics of anticounterfeiting enforcement against street vendors and flea market operators have largely been replaced with online takedown notices, mass litigations against unnamed defendants and border enforcement. On the flip side, the “counterfeiting” label is being applied to activities different from what we have seen in the past, as reflected in the Second Circuit’s decision in Tiffany & Co. v. Costco Wholesale Corp. and elsewhere. Join Tony Lo Cicero, Managing Partner of Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein as he discusses these developments and their likely impact for the future.
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...