The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Generative AI is transforming how lawyers work, but it’s also raising new ethical and practica...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
As the Holiday Season is upon us, the widely known “12 Days of Christmas” comes to mind ...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
We are at that time again. Resolution time. Or maybe they’re already nothing more than another...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...