The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
Insurance companies are interesting because they are beholden to the policy holder and to investors....
This comprehensive program synthesizes theatrical technique, psychology, communication theory, and t...
MODERATED-Session 8 of 10 -Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 5...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...