The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
MODERATED-This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involving multijurisdictional practice and ...
MODERATED - Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
This Continuing Legal Education presentation covers electronic discovery and the related ethical dut...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not ado...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
Generative AI is transforming how lawyers work, but it’s also raising new ethical and practica...