The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
This CLE will discuss the causes of action and potential causes of action in the bankruptcies relate...
Part 2 of this 4 Part series. As threats to national security and critical infrastructures grow, so ...
This presentation will cover the following. Tax Court is based in Washington, D.C., but its judges t...
Part 4 of this 4 Part series. As persons have sprinted to move to the cloud in an attempt to shift c...
This CLE will discuss the causes of action and potential causes of action in the litigations involvi...
Part 1 of this 4 Part series. Neither cybersecurity nor risk management are evaporating. To the cont...
The new Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government is already making headlin...
Recent advancements in AI are providing critical tools that have the potential to dramatically strea...
Almost all medical records are now required to be in electronic format to qualify for Medicare. ...
This CLE will discuss the recent Crypto bankruptcies such as FTX, Blockfi, Celsius and Genesis. We w...