The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
In this presentation, Vanessa Terzian uses examples from actual client documents to demonstrate comm...
Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...
This one-hour program will look at the key differences in policies available in the marketplace, dif...
Leaving federal government employment for the private or nonprofit sector raises important ethics is...
Clear, confident communication is one of the most powerful tools a lawyer can have, yet it’s o...
Join Steve Herman on December 8, 2025, for "Maintaining Ethical Standards: Essential Strategies for ...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...