The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
Nowhere is the gap between technology and regulation more pronounced than in AI. For lawyers, this o...
The False Claims Act (FCA) remains the Federal Government's primary fraud fighting statute. Stemming...
This 1-hour program provides a comprehensive exploration of the ethical and compliance challenges in...
Session 4 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Are you as knowledgeable in the Fair Lending regulations? Do you know how they pertain to your role ...
Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years,...
Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
The program objective is to provide the basis of US sanctions, including overview on enforcing agenc...
Unlike its counterpart on the privacy side, the HIPAA Security Rule has only rarely been updated, an...
This session is designed to help compliance professionals and fintech partners better understand the...