The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
This course provides attorneys with a detailed examination of Form 1120S, including legal considerat...
MODERATED-This CLE will discuss the critical issues relating to the use of social media and legal et...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involved in leaving government practice for the priva...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
This comprehensive program synthesizes theatrical technique, psychology, communication theory, and t...
Designed for legal practitioners, this session explains the structure and purpose of GAAP through a ...
A practical overview designed for attorneys new to financial reporting. The session connects GAAP co...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...