The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...
For decades, the Rule of Two in government contracting required federal agencies to set aside contra...
MODERATED-Session 5 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
MODERATED- I’m ok. I can work this out for myself. I’m not like a “real” ...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...