The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
This course introduces attorneys to the core principles of GAAP and the legal significance of standa...
This comprehensive program synthesizes theatrical technique, psychology, communication theory, and t...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
The value of diversity has been researched extensively for its impact on various industries, includi...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...