The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
This timely program will help make sense of a legal landscape in flux, as the presenter explains the...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This course introduces attorneys to the core principles of GAAP and the legal significance of standa...
Designed for legal practitioners, this session explains the structure and purpose of GAAP through a ...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...