The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
The value of diversity has been researched extensively for its impact on various industries, includi...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
MODERATED-Session 8 of 10 -Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 5...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...