The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
As lawyers, time is our most finite resource. We have duties to our clients to ensure that their mat...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...