The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
This comprehensive program synthesizes theatrical technique, psychology, communication theory, and t...
MODERATED-Part 2 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
MODERATED-This CLE will discuss the critical issues relating to the use of social media and legal et...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...