The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
Designed for legal practitioners, this session explains the structure and purpose of GAAP through a ...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involved in leaving government practice for the priva...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...