The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
MODERATED-Session 8 of 10 -Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 5...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
A practical overview designed for attorneys new to financial reporting. The session connects GAAP co...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...