The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
Generative AI is transforming how lawyers work, but it’s also raising new ethical and practica...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
This one-hour program will look at the key differences in policies available in the marketplace, dif...
MODERATED- I’m ok. I can work this out for myself. I’m not like a “real” ...
MODERATED-Part 2 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
MODERATED-This CLE will discuss the critical issues relating to the use of social media and legal et...
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...