The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
The value of diversity has been researched extensively for its impact on various industries, includi...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...