The Supreme Court is set to hear oral argument in VIP Prods. LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc., a case that asks whether that VIP’s “Bad Spaniels” dog toy whimsically mimicking the appearance of a Jack Daniels whisky bottle is protected expression under the First Amendment. The case follows a long and uncertain line of parody products cases, and, by tying the defense of such cases to the First Amendment, has the potential to undo almost entirely the rights of brand owners to limit such mischievous marketing practices.
Jonathan Moskin and Ashley Koley of Foley & Lardner trace key points in the history of the law of fair use from its origins in the Supreme Court 100 years ago to its present somewhat muddied state, and turn to the horizon to offer insights into where the Supreme Court might bring some clarity going forward.
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...