Giuliani and ‘Throwing a Fake’: How the Ethics Rules Govern Misleading Conduct

01 Nov , 2022

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

In a recently released transcript, Rudy Giuliani told federal agents it was permissible to “throw a fake” during an electoral campaign. Just weeks before that transcript became public, Giuliani was suspended from the practice of law in New York for baselessly asserting that thousands of felons and dead people voted during the 2020 presidential election and that Georgia voting machines had been manipulated. 

This program will examine the ethics rules implicated by Giuliani’s recent conduct—ABA Rules 1.2, 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4—and provide guidance on how to avoid suffering Rudy’s fate.

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

More Webcasts

Trial Starts Now: Wi...

Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...

Digital Organization...

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...

Freedom of Informati...

During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...

Winning Bad Faith Cl...

This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...

Evidence in Action: ...

Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...

How to Respond to Sh...

Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...

Mastering the Inner ...

Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...

AI Agents Unleashed:...

AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...

Freediving Through F...

Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...

Key Trends Defining ...

Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...