Giuliani and ‘Throwing a Fake’: How the Ethics Rules Govern Misleading Conduct

01 Nov , 2022

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

In a recently released transcript, Rudy Giuliani told federal agents it was permissible to “throw a fake” during an electoral campaign. Just weeks before that transcript became public, Giuliani was suspended from the practice of law in New York for baselessly asserting that thousands of felons and dead people voted during the 2020 presidential election and that Georgia voting machines had been manipulated. 

This program will examine the ethics rules implicated by Giuliani’s recent conduct—ABA Rules 1.2, 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4—and provide guidance on how to avoid suffering Rudy’s fate.

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

More Webcasts

How to Respond to Sh...

Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...

Beyond the Bargainin...

Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...

AI Agents Unleashed:...

AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...

Evidence in Action: ...

Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...

Freedom of Informati...

During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...

Artificial Intellige...

"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...

Preventing Death by ...

Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...

Advanced Negotiation...

Advanced Negotiation Strategies for Lawyers explores the psychology and strategy behind successful l...

Thinking Like a Lawy...

Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...

Key Trends Defining ...

Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...