Giuliani and ‘Throwing a Fake’: How the Ethics Rules Govern Misleading Conduct

01 Nov , 2022

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

In a recently released transcript, Rudy Giuliani told federal agents it was permissible to “throw a fake” during an electoral campaign. Just weeks before that transcript became public, Giuliani was suspended from the practice of law in New York for baselessly asserting that thousands of felons and dead people voted during the 2020 presidential election and that Georgia voting machines had been manipulated. 

This program will examine the ethics rules implicated by Giuliani’s recent conduct—ABA Rules 1.2, 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4—and provide guidance on how to avoid suffering Rudy’s fate.

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

More Webcasts

AI Governance in the...

AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...

Litigation Series: E...

Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...

Criminal Mitigation ...

This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...

Labor Law Compliance...

Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...

Ethics, Confidential...

Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...

Building the Data Pr...

Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...

Claims and Requests ...

During this presentation, you will learn about the regulations and caselaw controlling claims and re...

Springing Into “Ma...

In 2016, the term “materiality” as it relates to the False Claims Act made a splash in t...

Litigation Strategie...

This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...

Litigation Series: E...

Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...