Giuliani and ‘Throwing a Fake’: How the Ethics Rules Govern Misleading Conduct

01 Nov , 2022

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

In a recently released transcript, Rudy Giuliani told federal agents it was permissible to “throw a fake” during an electoral campaign. Just weeks before that transcript became public, Giuliani was suspended from the practice of law in New York for baselessly asserting that thousands of felons and dead people voted during the 2020 presidential election and that Georgia voting machines had been manipulated. 

This program will examine the ethics rules implicated by Giuliani’s recent conduct—ABA Rules 1.2, 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4—and provide guidance on how to avoid suffering Rudy’s fate.

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

More Webcasts

The Inner Critic and...

In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...

Litigation Series: M...

This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...

Best Behavior: Effec...

This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...

Law in the Age of La...

Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems   capable of generating...

National Security & ...

In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...

Litigation Series: L...

This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...

What Is GAAP? (Defin...

This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...

Reinventing Project ...

The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...

A Lawyer’s Guide T...

‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...

Demand to Deal: Stra...

Successful personal injury defense practice requires far more than strong legal arguments—it d...