This program, Ethical Concerns for Cannabis Attorneys, will cover conflicts with federal law, the interplay between MRPC 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.13, 1.18, 2.1, 5.1, 5.5, and 8.4 and cannabis, state variation on ethical rules, criminal law considerations, ethical considerations with owning cannabis businesses, and securing licenses vs. enforcing rights of licenses.
The program will take a special look at how Maine’s Ethics Commission has addressed two main ethical concerns cannabis attorneys face: whether attorneys are permitted to advise clients on behavior dealing with marijuana and whether attorneys are permitted to provide services beyond giving legal advice to clients. Maine’s approach acts as a case study examining the development of the Ethics Commission’s approach to, and rules on practicing law in the cannabis industry.
For at least the last half-century, the success or failure of most litigations is determined by how ...
This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...