This program, Ethical Concerns for Cannabis Attorneys, will cover conflicts with federal law, the interplay between MRPC 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.13, 1.18, 2.1, 5.1, 5.5, and 8.4 and cannabis, state variation on ethical rules, criminal law considerations, ethical considerations with owning cannabis businesses, and securing licenses vs. enforcing rights of licenses.
The program will take a special look at how Maine’s Ethics Commission has addressed two main ethical concerns cannabis attorneys face: whether attorneys are permitted to advise clients on behavior dealing with marijuana and whether attorneys are permitted to provide services beyond giving legal advice to clients. Maine’s approach acts as a case study examining the development of the Ethics Commission’s approach to, and rules on practicing law in the cannabis industry.
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
“Is Your Voice Biometric Data? BIPA, AI and the New Era of Voiceprint Litigation” looks ...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...