This program, Ethical Concerns for Cannabis Attorneys, will cover conflicts with federal law, the interplay between MRPC 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.13, 1.18, 2.1, 5.1, 5.5, and 8.4 and cannabis, state variation on ethical rules, criminal law considerations, ethical considerations with owning cannabis businesses, and securing licenses vs. enforcing rights of licenses.
The program will take a special look at how Maine’s Ethics Commission has addressed two main ethical concerns cannabis attorneys face: whether attorneys are permitted to advise clients on behavior dealing with marijuana and whether attorneys are permitted to provide services beyond giving legal advice to clients. Maine’s approach acts as a case study examining the development of the Ethics Commission’s approach to, and rules on practicing law in the cannabis industry.
MODERATED-Session 4 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
For decades, the Rule of Two in government contracting required federal agencies to set aside contra...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
This comprehensive program synthesizes theatrical technique, psychology, communication theory, and t...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
MODERATED-This CLE will discuss the critical issues relating to the use of social media and legal et...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...