This program, Ethical Concerns for Cannabis Attorneys, will cover conflicts with federal law, the interplay between MRPC 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.13, 1.18, 2.1, 5.1, 5.5, and 8.4 and cannabis, state variation on ethical rules, criminal law considerations, ethical considerations with owning cannabis businesses, and securing licenses vs. enforcing rights of licenses.
The program will take a special look at how Maine’s Ethics Commission has addressed two main ethical concerns cannabis attorneys face: whether attorneys are permitted to advise clients on behavior dealing with marijuana and whether attorneys are permitted to provide services beyond giving legal advice to clients. Maine’s approach acts as a case study examining the development of the Ethics Commission’s approach to, and rules on practicing law in the cannabis industry.
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...