This program, Ethical Concerns for Cannabis Attorneys, will cover conflicts with federal law, the interplay between MRPC 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.13, 1.18, 2.1, 5.1, 5.5, and 8.4 and cannabis, state variation on ethical rules, criminal law considerations, ethical considerations with owning cannabis businesses, and securing licenses vs. enforcing rights of licenses.
The program will take a special look at how Maine’s Ethics Commission has addressed two main ethical concerns cannabis attorneys face: whether attorneys are permitted to advise clients on behavior dealing with marijuana and whether attorneys are permitted to provide services beyond giving legal advice to clients. Maine’s approach acts as a case study examining the development of the Ethics Commission’s approach to, and rules on practicing law in the cannabis industry.
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...