This program, Ethical Concerns for Cannabis Attorneys, will cover conflicts with federal law, the interplay between MRPC 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.13, 1.18, 2.1, 5.1, 5.5, and 8.4 and cannabis, state variation on ethical rules, criminal law considerations, ethical considerations with owning cannabis businesses, and securing licenses vs. enforcing rights of licenses.
The program will take a special look at how Maine’s Ethics Commission has addressed two main ethical concerns cannabis attorneys face: whether attorneys are permitted to advise clients on behavior dealing with marijuana and whether attorneys are permitted to provide services beyond giving legal advice to clients. Maine’s approach acts as a case study examining the development of the Ethics Commission’s approach to, and rules on practicing law in the cannabis industry.
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
MODERATED - Session 1 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
This one-hour program will look at the key differences in policies available in the marketplace, dif...
MODERATED-This course is designed to inform patent practitioners on the bounds of the Hatch-Waxman S...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
For decades, the Rule of Two in government contracting required federal agencies to set aside contra...
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
MODERATED-Session 4 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...