In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...