In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This presentation serves as a critical follow-up to the June 12, 2026, session on PTAB Discretionary...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...