In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...