In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...