In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...