In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...