In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
Abrasive or burned out? Overworked or uncivil? Zealous advocate or bully? The legal profession is c...