In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...