In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...