In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This CLE program equips attorneys to advise clients on the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues ari...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...