In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This is a comprehensive continuing legal education program designed exclusively for personal injury ...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...