In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-worl...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Many solo and small law firms assume AI governance is something only large firms need. It is not. AI...
Negotiations impact almost every aspect of your life when you have to deal with other people, be the...