In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...