In Humphries vs. Pa State Univ., 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182858, 2021 WL 4355352 (M.D. Pa. September 24, 2021) (Brann, J, negligence claims against Penn State for the hazing and sexual abuse of a college athlete who ultimately left the school were dismissed. The Court found there was no negligence per se, negligence, duty or contractual right. Even though there were rather dramatic and lengthy allegations concerning how the student was treated and claims that the University turning a blind eye, the Court found there was no abuse, no affirmative duty, and no harassment because of sex. The action was dismissed because plaintiffs had been permitted to amend previously.
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
“Is Your Voice Biometric Data? BIPA, AI and the New Era of Voiceprint Litigation” looks ...