Challenging an ongoing investigation by the SEC is a daunting task, particularly for those identified as subjects of the investigation. Two recent holdings, one by the Third Circuit in Gentile v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, 2020 WL 5416297 (3d Cir. Sept. 10, 2020) and the other by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Gentile, 16-cv-01619-BRM-JAD (Order Sept. 29, 2020), both of which involved the same parties, offer some clarification on when and how best to mount such a challenge. The Third Circuit’s opinion makes clear that the SEC’s ability to investigate is one of the “rare circumstances” in which an agency’s action is exempt from the waiver of sovereign immunity that might otherwise apply under the Administrative Procedure Act and, as a result, is not subject to judicial review. By contrast, the district court’s opinion reinforces that, once an investigation results in an enforcement action in federal court, the SEC is subject to the court’s rules and review as any other litigant. Taken together, these opinions present both practitioners and those in the securities industry with useful guidance in when and how to challenge the SEC.
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...