Challenging an ongoing investigation by the SEC is a daunting task, particularly for those identified as subjects of the investigation. Two recent holdings, one by the Third Circuit in Gentile v. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, 2020 WL 5416297 (3d Cir. Sept. 10, 2020) and the other by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Gentile, 16-cv-01619-BRM-JAD (Order Sept. 29, 2020), both of which involved the same parties, offer some clarification on when and how best to mount such a challenge. The Third Circuit’s opinion makes clear that the SEC’s ability to investigate is one of the “rare circumstances” in which an agency’s action is exempt from the waiver of sovereign immunity that might otherwise apply under the Administrative Procedure Act and, as a result, is not subject to judicial review. By contrast, the district court’s opinion reinforces that, once an investigation results in an enforcement action in federal court, the SEC is subject to the court’s rules and review as any other litigant. Taken together, these opinions present both practitioners and those in the securities industry with useful guidance in when and how to challenge the SEC.
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
MODERATED-Session 8 of 10 -Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 5...
MODERATED-This CLE will discuss the critical issues relating to the use of social media and legal et...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
MODERATED-This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involving multijurisdictional practice and ...
AI tops the news seemingly every day. The technology is growing in use and application as lawyers, c...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...