Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...