Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...