Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...