Allegations of sexual abuse often come years after the abuse was alleged to have happened. In these cases, the memories of the outcrier and others are often the only evidence in the case. An understanding of the reconstructive nature of human memory becomes paramount in defending such allegations.
This seminar will briefly explore how human memory works, and more importantly how it doesn't work. Research studies will be reviewed which establish that memories can easily be created or distorted when retrieved at long delays. Applications to several real-world delayed outcry cases will also be discussed as examples.
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...