It has become quite routine for attorneys to utilize protective orders or confidentiality orders in complex litigation matters. The reasons are multi-faceted, and can include something as simple as protection of one party (or both) parties’ confidential and proprietary information, and can range from expediting the flow of discovery material to facilitating the prompt and efficient resolution of disputes. However, certain decisions have warned against the overuse of protective orders. This program will provide a diverse discussion among plaintiff and defense counsel and a retired federal magistrate judge relating to protective orders generally, the protection of propriety information, and practice tips for attorneys involved in complex litigation who are facing similar issues.
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...