Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...