Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...