Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This presentation serves as a critical follow-up to the June 12, 2026, session on PTAB Discretionary...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...