Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...