Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...