Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...