Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This is a comprehensive continuing legal education program designed exclusively for personal injury ...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...