Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...