Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...