Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
Permission to Pivot: Ethics, Well-Being, and Redefining Your Legal Career examines the intersection ...
In addition to the fears about Opening Statements and Closing Arguments that lawyers know about &nda...
Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Session 3 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Decision making capacity and professional responsibility should be at the top of every attorney's li...
Session 8 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Aggressive litigation tactics can derail proceedings, intimidate parties, and challenge even the mos...
Balance billing in healthcare, especially in relation to Government Programs poses a significant ris...
Two pivotal contractual provisions are indemnification and limitations on liability. Yet, these two ...