Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...