Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...