Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
Unrecorded time, vague entries, and end-of-month write-offs cost firms significant revenue. This pra...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
Most lawyers are aware of the high-profile cases in which attorneys were sanctioned or otherwise dis...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...