Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...