Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...