Generative AI platforms can create diverse content, such as marketing materials, translations, and source code. However, they also raise various legal issues, such as who owns the output, whether it infringes on existing works, and whether it is eligible for protection. As generative AI becomes more widespread and used by employees in different industries, companies need to be careful about how they adopt and use these platforms, especially how they handle the output and integrate it with other information.
This program, by Emily Tait and Carl Kukkonen, will discuss the legal challenges of using generative AI, and the potential impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith.
Advanced Negotiation Strategies for Lawyers explores the psychology and strategy behind successful l...
Abrasive or burned out? Overworked or uncivil? Zealous advocate or bully? The legal profession is c...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...