Practitioners need to know how the Supreme Court’s decision in Badgerow alters litigation strategy and jurisdiction in the challenging and enforcement of arbitration decisions both in state and federal court.
Our presenters will discuss the enforcement of awards, jurisdiction for enforcement and grounds to set aside awards. Special focus on licensing and franchise arbitrations addressing trademark considerations.
Key takeaways:
• The Supreme Court resolves issues regarding jurisdiction for confirming or setting aside arbitration awards.
• Special issues for arbitration of licensing and franchise agreements.
• Grounds for setting aside arbitration awards.
• Strategies for enforcement and challenging awards.
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
This program reframes domestic violence through the lens of “intimate terrorism,” equipp...
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...