Practitioners need to know how the Supreme Court’s decision in Badgerow alters litigation strategy and jurisdiction in the challenging and enforcement of arbitration decisions both in state and federal court.
Our presenters will discuss the enforcement of awards, jurisdiction for enforcement and grounds to set aside awards. Special focus on licensing and franchise arbitrations addressing trademark considerations.
Key takeaways:
• The Supreme Court resolves issues regarding jurisdiction for confirming or setting aside arbitration awards.
• Special issues for arbitration of licensing and franchise agreements.
• Grounds for setting aside arbitration awards.
• Strategies for enforcement and challenging awards.
The program will cover a wide range of mediation strategies including preparing an effective mediati...
Many of us were attracted to the legal profession because we care about people and want to help them...
Navigating the web of legal ethics issues faced by counsel in today’s legal climate is a chall...
Part 2 in a 2-part series - Human expression has always fascinated me. In this presentation, I begin...
The issuance of continuing Executive Orders by the Biden Administration as a result of and in respon...
In the last 20 years, our profession has devoted a great deal of attention to the mental health of a...
Confidentiality is one of the most valuable – but misunderstood – benefits that internat...
Recent legislative developments may significantly impact the Franchisor- Franchisee relationship mor...
When we think of criminal antitrust enforcement, we often think of monopolies and widespread price-f...
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court, in Murphy vs. NCAA, held that sports gambling was legal in...