Practitioners need to know how the Supreme Court’s decision in Badgerow alters litigation strategy and jurisdiction in the challenging and enforcement of arbitration decisions both in state and federal court.
Our presenters will discuss the enforcement of awards, jurisdiction for enforcement and grounds to set aside awards. Special focus on licensing and franchise arbitrations addressing trademark considerations.
Key takeaways:
• The Supreme Court resolves issues regarding jurisdiction for confirming or setting aside arbitration awards.
• Special issues for arbitration of licensing and franchise agreements.
• Grounds for setting aside arbitration awards.
• Strategies for enforcement and challenging awards.
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
MODERATED - Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
MODERATED - Session 1 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
MODERATED-Session 3 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
MODERATED-This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involving multijurisdictional practice and ...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
MODERATED-Part 1 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...