Practitioners need to know how the Supreme Court’s decision in Badgerow alters litigation strategy and jurisdiction in the challenging and enforcement of arbitration decisions both in state and federal court.
Our presenters will discuss the enforcement of awards, jurisdiction for enforcement and grounds to set aside awards. Special focus on licensing and franchise arbitrations addressing trademark considerations.
Key takeaways:
• The Supreme Court resolves issues regarding jurisdiction for confirming or setting aside arbitration awards.
• Special issues for arbitration of licensing and franchise agreements.
• Grounds for setting aside arbitration awards.
• Strategies for enforcement and challenging awards.
A variety of types of cases require an understanding of anatomy. Equally, cases require the utilizat...
Balance billing in healthcare, especially in relation to Government Programs poses a significant ris...
This 1-hour program provides a comprehensive exploration of the ethical and compliance challenges in...
Decision making capacity and professional responsibility should be at the top of every attorney's li...
Session 8 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Session 3 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
In this presentation, Vanessa Terzian uses examples from actual client documents to demonstrate comm...
Revocable versus irrevocable, dynasty versus by-pass and special needs versus Medicaid asset protect...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
There are many hidden dangers in frequently used digital tools and media platforms, including social...