Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
Practitioners need to know how the Supreme Court’s decision in Badgerow alters litigation strategy and jurisdiction in the challenging and enforcement of arbitration decisions both in state and federal court.
Our presenters will discuss the enforcement of awards, jurisdiction for enforcement and grounds to set aside awards. Special focus on licensing and franchise arbitrations addressing trademark considerations.
Key takeaways:
• The Supreme Court resolves issues regarding jurisdiction for confirming or setting aside arbitration awards.
• Special issues for arbitration of licensing and franchise agreements.
• Grounds for setting aside arbitration awards.
• Strategies for enforcement and challenging awards.
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...