Practitioners need to know how the Supreme Court’s decision in Badgerow alters litigation strategy and jurisdiction in the challenging and enforcement of arbitration decisions both in state and federal court.
Our presenters will discuss the enforcement of awards, jurisdiction for enforcement and grounds to set aside awards. Special focus on licensing and franchise arbitrations addressing trademark considerations.
Key takeaways:
• The Supreme Court resolves issues regarding jurisdiction for confirming or setting aside arbitration awards.
• Special issues for arbitration of licensing and franchise agreements.
• Grounds for setting aside arbitration awards.
• Strategies for enforcement and challenging awards.
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...