The privilege rests on the need to know all that relates to the client’s reasons for seeking legal help and is strictly construed to protect against others seeking to know. Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 (1980).
The Supreme Court has repeatedly declared: “In our judicial system, the public has a right to every person’s evidence subject to the invocation of privilege”.
Learn more in the tantalizing presentation by the esteemed Jay Goldberg!
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Com1s for 52 years, has...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...