The privilege rests on the need to know all that relates to the client’s reasons for seeking legal help and is strictly construed to protect against others seeking to know. Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 (1980).
The Supreme Court has repeatedly declared: “In our judicial system, the public has a right to every person’s evidence subject to the invocation of privilege”.
Learn more in the tantalizing presentation by the esteemed Jay Goldberg!
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...