The privilege rests on the need to know all that relates to the client’s reasons for seeking legal help and is strictly construed to protect against others seeking to know. Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 (1980).
The Supreme Court has repeatedly declared: “In our judicial system, the public has a right to every person’s evidence subject to the invocation of privilege”.
Learn more in the tantalizing presentation by the esteemed Jay Goldberg!
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not ado...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
We are at that time again. Resolution time. Or maybe they’re already nothing more than another...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...