The privilege rests on the need to know all that relates to the client’s reasons for seeking legal help and is strictly construed to protect against others seeking to know. Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 51 (1980).
The Supreme Court has repeatedly declared: “In our judicial system, the public has a right to every person’s evidence subject to the invocation of privilege”.
Learn more in the tantalizing presentation by the esteemed Jay Goldberg!
Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not ado...
Join Steve Herman on December 8, 2025, for "Maintaining Ethical Standards: Essential Strategies for ...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Addressing the sensitive subjects of incapacity, death and health care are not either seamless or pa...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" "She's the firm's rainmaker, but something isn't r...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...