Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
Unrecorded time, vague entries, and end-of-month write-offs cost firms significant revenue. This pra...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
Most lawyers are aware of the high-profile cases in which attorneys were sanctioned or otherwise dis...