Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a criminal case, as to whether “most people” in the defendant’s position have a particular mental state, does not run afoul of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b)’s prohibition against expert opinion evidence about whether a criminal defendant had or lacked the mental state required for conviction. Particularly in white-collar cases, where the defendant’s intent is often the central disputed issue, the implications of Diaz may be far-reaching.
This presentation will explore the background and contours of Rule 704(b), examine Diaz and other decisions relevant to the Rule, and consider defense strategies in a post-Diaz landscape.
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...