Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials and confidence can intimidate juries. It provides tools for leveling the playing field by challenging assumptions, narrowing opinions, and reframing expertise in accessible, relatable terms.
Through structured questioning and careful preparation, lawyers learn to expose bias, highlight limitations, and reinforce their own narrative—ensuring experts inform the case rather than dominate it.
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This course provides a strategic roadmap for attorneys to transition from administrative burnout to ...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Attorneys and law firms are well known vectors for money laundering risk. Banks regularly labe...