Force Majeure Clauses in Contracts: Drafting and Enforcing Provisions for U.S. and International Agreements

25 Jun , 2024

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

As the global economy continues to face the impacts of natural disasters, extreme weather, war, supply chain disruptions and other challenges, businesses may default on contractual obligations. To mitigate liability for unprecedented events, many companies are taking a closer look at force majeure clauses, which were previously considered a boilerplate feature of most agreements that were seldom negotiated or considered by counsel. However, since the COVID-19 pandemic, contract drafters are now taking care in drafting force majeure clauses as a way to provide an affirmative defense to default.

Businesses must determine whether circumstances presented by various events meet the legal requirements of force majeure and that such provisions are sufficiently specific to be enforceable. For a party to invoke the clause, the event must be unforeseeable. Boilerplate agreement language often includes a laundry list of events defining an "act of God," but a court may or may not agree that a particular event is covered. Further, enforcement of a force majeure clause requires that the company prove that the force majeure event defined in the contract caused a party's inability to perform a contract obligation.

Force majeure enforcement is also highly contingent on the country of implementation and, in this circumstance, the impact of a particular event on a region's supply chain and workforce. China and the European Union use varying definitions for enforcement, and anticipating issues that may arise in a default informs counsel on how to draft the optimal provision to protect a business from future catastrophic losses.

Nicholas J. Ellis, Partner at Foley & Lardner; Neil C. Schur, Shareholder, Co-Chair Antitrust and Unfair Competition Group at Anderson Kill; and Josh Wurtzel, partner at Schlam Stone Dolan, will focus on drafting force majeure clauses to address the issues and factors required by U.S. courts for enforcement, as well as addressing the international reach and interpretation of what "superior force" may mean on a global level. The panel will guide counsel on the precise nature of the language needed, what constitutes "unforeseeable," the causation between an event and non-performance, and evidence that effects are so severe that an obligation cannot be performed.

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

More Webcasts

Billing Ethics: Get ...

This webinar focuses on ways to capture more revenue by reducing or eliminating non-payment, late pa...

Silence in Court! Mo...

“Movement psychology” is a branch of psychology that emerged in the early twentieth cent...

The Specter of Sover...

In recent years, the enforcement of commercial and investment arbitration awards against sovereigns ...

Mediation Ethics: Wh...

Sometimes in a negotiation, you find your hands tied. You can't back down. Push hard to get a deal, ...

When Good Enough Isn...

“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Why do I...

Hot Topics in Advert...

Join Sheila Millar, leader of Keller and Heckman LLP’s consumer protection regulatory practice...

Litigating Asylum Cl...

You have accepted representation in a defensive asylum case before the immigration court – now...

When a Conflict of I...

Many malpractice cases filed against lawyers involve allegations of conflict of interest. As a matte...

Reinvigorating the L...

A former complex litigation judge suggests winning strategies for making lawsuits faster and less ex...

Utilizing Technology...

90% of legal services will be delivered online by 2030. Don’t get left behind as the industry ...