Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
“Is Your Voice Biometric Data? BIPA, AI and the New Era of Voiceprint Litigation” looks ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Attendees will learn how to effectively cross-examine witnesses at trial. The conventional wis...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...