Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...