Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...