Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...