Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...