Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
The legal industry is in the middle of the largest generational transfer of law firm ownership in it...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...