Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...