Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...