Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...