Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...