Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...