Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
This course is meant for lawyers of all levels and areas of practice, and in it, we will explore way...
This seminar concerns a scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act. The Act ...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...