Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...