Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
Unrecorded time, vague entries, and end-of-month write-offs cost firms significant revenue. This pra...