Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...