Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...