Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...