Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
The legal industry is in the middle of the largest generational transfer of law firm ownership in it...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Most lawyers are aware of the high-profile cases in which attorneys were sanctioned or otherwise dis...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...