Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...