Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...