Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...