Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...