Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...