Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...