Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...