Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...