Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This presentation aims to explore various models and cases of artificial intelligence use in healthc...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...