Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...