Attorneys on both the executive side and the company side have an interest in drafting an employment agreement that minimizes negative tax consequences. Sections 409A or 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) can result in various negative tax consequences if certain compensation arrangements aren’t structured properly, including additional taxes owed by the individual and lost tax deductions for the company.
This program goes over some of the ways to draft an executive employment agreement in a way that avoids those negative tax consequences and highlights features that attorneys should be aware of that could implicate Code Section 409A or Code Section 280G.
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
This presentation provides a basic overview of AI governance in the United States for in-house attor...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
AI tools are advancing faster than legal organizations can absorb them. This program examines why th...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...