This ethics program will explore how in-house counsel can successfully master the Engagement Agreement process when hiring counsel, experts, consultants, and vendors for litigation or transactions.
Our panel will guide attendees through the entire process – the necessary preparation (including the Request for Proposal (“RFP”) process); the drafting process (including incorporation of both hourly rates/fees plus any potential expenses to be incurred); and general best corporate/firm practices to maximize the benefits of what in today’s legal market is the most useful first step to address and prepare for an upcoming litigation or transaction.
The program will particularly focus on the following topics:
• The fundamental underpinnings of the negotiation/drafting process, Rules of Professional Conduct 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, Rule 5, and the client’s obligation and responsibility to select the scope of work and the terms/conditions of payment
• How the Rules of Professional Conduct apply to the Engagement Agreement Process
• Best practices in determining the content of your Engagement Agreement (assessment of the matter, evaluating risks/stakes, determination of type of counsel, experts, vendors, and consultants to hire, size/location of firm, roles for multiple counsel, etc.)
• Structuring the Engagement Agreement (format and substance)
• Incorporating various stages of litigation/transaction into your Engagement Agreement
• Incorporating language to maximize information received on budgeting and anticipated costs for your litigation/transaction
• Miscellaneous clauses/provisions to enhance the value and effectiveness of your Engagement Agreement
• Incorporation of and adherence to Outside Counsel Billing Guidelines
• Lessons learned and surprises encountered during the negotiation/finalization process.
Through their widely diverse range of experience on these issues (from in-house, private practice, and fee expert perspectives), our speakers will provide insights on a topic that affects everyone in today’s legal and business market.
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
Established in 1992, the 340B Drug Pricing Program has many nuances and applications to different si...
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...