A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...