A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Successful personal injury defense practice requires far more than strong legal arguments—it d...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...