A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This CLE program equips attorneys to advise clients on the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues ari...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...