A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This is a comprehensive continuing legal education program designed exclusively for personal injury ...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...