A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...