A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...