Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...