A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...