A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...