A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...