A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...