A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
AI tools are advancing faster than legal organizations can absorb them. This program examines why th...