A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...