A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Insurance companies are interesting because they are beholden to the policy holder and to investors....
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
MODERATED-Session 8 of 10 -Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 5...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
This course introduces attorneys to the core principles of GAAP and the legal significance of standa...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...