A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
This seminar concerns a scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act. The Act ...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...