A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
MODERATED - Session 1 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
Dave Place, Esq., Founder of The Place Firm, will present a CLE providing practical tips to empower ...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
For decades, the Rule of Two in government contracting required federal agencies to set aside contra...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
MODERATED-Part 2 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not ado...