A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
The bar that grand jury targets face in challenging a grand jury subpoena or seeking access to a gra...
The United States Constitution is one of the most influential legal documents in history, establishi...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...