A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...