A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...