A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This CLE program gives attorneys a practical command of the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues ar...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...