A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...