A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Com1s for 52 years, has...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...