A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Com1s for 52 years, has...