A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...