Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Over the past year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has undergone a dramatic policy shift r...