A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...