A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
A practical overview designed for attorneys new to financial reporting. The session connects GAAP co...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...