A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...