A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...