A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...