A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...