A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
The program will cover the key issues for lawyer leaving government employment including the nuances...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Negotiations impact almost every aspect of your life when you have to deal with other people, be the...
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...