A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...
The program will cover the key issues for lawyer leaving government employment including the nuances...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...