A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...