A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...