A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...