A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...