A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...