A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...