A careful look at the application of the political question doctrine and government contractor defense by courts across the country reveals meaningful regional differences that can have significant impact on the viability of a claim against a government contractor in a military aviation case. Not only does application of these important affirmative defenses differ between state and federal court, but also between federal circuits.
This presentation highlights the need to know the battlefield in choosing the best available forum for suit because the decision on where to file can determine whether the claim succeeds or fails.
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...