Join us for an insightful program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the dynamic intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). This program will explore three prominent types of AI-driven ADR: Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), Blockchain ODR, and Facilitative ODR; and how they truly impact the practice of dispute resolution. Attorneys will gain an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages associated with these technologies. Additionally, we will delve into the current and potential ethical considerations inherent in their application. Specifically, the program will discuss the following Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 1.1 (Competence); Rule 1.4 (Communications); Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information); and Rule 1.15 (Safekeeping Property). By the program's conclusion, participants will appreciate the valuable role AI plays as an assistant in ADR processes while recognizing the irreplaceable expertise and ethical judgment that humans bring to the resolution table. Participants will also learn practice pointers for maintaining confidentiality and avoiding common pitfalls when utilizing these tools.
Part 2 - This presentation provides a comprehensive exploration of the theme of perfectionism, the i...
This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involving multijurisdictional practice and avoiding t...
There is a growing trend of parties inserting restrictive covenant provisions into alternative entit...
Technology empowers – but also enormously enlarges the risks facing lawyers and law firms. It&...
A noncitizen’s legal status can present thorny issues you should consider in pursuing your cli...
The CLE will discuss the role of New York Labor Law Section 201-d in regulating employee conduct ins...
Everyday, lawyers have to navigate conflicts of interest to determine when they can take on a new re...
Part 2 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert witnesses. ...
Employment litigation often rises or falls on the question of what the employer did to prevent and r...
In Diaz v. United States, 144 S.Ct. 1727 (2024), a divided court held that expert testimony in a cri...