Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
This program reframes domestic violence through the lens of “intimate terrorism,” equipp...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...