Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Many solo and small law firms assume AI governance is something only large firms need. It is not. AI...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
During this presentation, you will learn about the regulations and caselaw controlling claims and re...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Negotiations impact almost every aspect of your life when you have to deal with other people, be the...