Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...