Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years,...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
As the Holiday Season is upon us, the widely known “12 Days of Christmas” comes to mind ...
Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not ado...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
Addressing the sensitive subjects of incapacity, death and health care are not either seamless or pa...
Decision making capacity and professional responsibility should be at the top of every attorney's li...