Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...