Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...