Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...