Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...
This program reframes domestic violence through the lens of “intimate terrorism,” equipp...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...