Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
For at least the last half-century, the success or failure of most litigations is determined by how ...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Cybercriminals increasingly target law firms, attorneys, legal staff, and their clients through soph...