Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...