Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Com1s for 52 years, has...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...