Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...