Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...