Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Successful personal injury defense practice requires far more than strong legal arguments—it d...