Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This presentation serves as a critical follow-up to the June 12, 2026, session on PTAB Discretionary...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...