Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...