Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...