Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...