Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
In this second segment we will continue with our journey into the multiple elements of high-level ne...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This CLE program, “Your Most Powerful Trial Tool Isn’t What You Say—It’s How...
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...