Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Different situations call for different tactics. Sometimes, the parties are both amenable to seeking...
MODERATED-Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...