Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
This continuing legal education (CLE) webinar provides comprehensive update on work? place safety ma...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...