Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...