Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...