Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Substance use disorders and mental health challenges can affect any attorney regardless of gender, c...
In addition to the fears about Opening Statements and Closing Arguments that lawyers know about &nda...
This session provides an in-depth examination of the fiduciary duties that both minority and majorit...
Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Aggressive litigation tactics can derail proceedings, intimidate parties, and challenge even the mos...
Designed for beginning estate planning attorneys, this comprehensive course provides a practical fou...
As Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals become increasingly common across collegiate athletics, att...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
There are many hidden dangers in frequently used digital tools and media platforms, including social...