Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...