Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Many solo and small law firms assume AI governance is something only large firms need. It is not. AI...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...