Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...