Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...