Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...