Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
The issuance of continuing Executive Orders by the Biden Administration as a result of and in respon...
This program will provide a detailed look at a variety of liens the practitioner may encounter while...
“Movement psychology” is a branch of psychology that emerged in the early twentieth cent...
Confidentiality is one of the most valuable – but misunderstood – benefits that internat...
In this program, we will cover the purposes of Shareholders’ Agreements and the types of share...
“Movement psychology” is a branch of psychology that emerged in the early twentieth cent...
This Program is intended to provide the essential background that a practitioner should possess in d...
The program will cover a wide range of mediation strategies including preparing an effective mediati...
“Movement psychology” is a branch of psychology that emerged in the early twentieth cent...
As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to evolve, including large language models (LL...