Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...