Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This CLE program equips attorneys to advise clients on the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues ari...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...