Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Cellphones represent one of the fastest-changing areas of legal practice. Mobile device evidence is ...
MODERATED-Session 6 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
MODERATED-Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not ado...