Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...