Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...