Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...