Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...