Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...