Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...