Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This CLE program, “Your Most Powerful Trial Tool Isn’t What You Say—It’s How...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
During this presentation, you will learn about the regulations and caselaw controlling claims and re...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...