Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
In this presentation, Vanessa Terzian uses examples from actual client documents to demonstrate comm...
Social media is no longer optional for lawyers who want to build and sustain a thriving practice&mda...
This program will cover the sources from which practitioners can gather documents, witnesses, and ot...
Decision making capacity and professional responsibility should be at the top of every attorney's li...
Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
This program will explain the nuts and bolts of pursuing common claims against the federal governmen...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Leaving federal government employment for the private or nonprofit sector raises important ethics is...
This one-hour program will look at the key differences in policies available in the marketplace, dif...
Passed in 1935, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) provides rights and protections to almost al...