Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
As artificial intelligence becomes the engine of the global economy, the value of "AI-ready" data ha...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...