Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
The United States Constitution is one of the most influential legal documents in history, establishi...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the strategy and economics of patent litigation, from locating ...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...