Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This CLE program equips attorneys to advise clients on the legal, regulatory, and ethical issues ari...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...