Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...