Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...