Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Confidentiality Agreements (also called NDAs) are too often treated as routine. So routine, th...
This course analyzes federal titling and indexing requirements and how to expunge or amend your reco...
This course is meant for lawyers of all levels and areas of practice, and in it, we will explore way...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...