Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...