Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...