Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
Unlike its counterpart on the privacy side, the HIPAA Security Rule has only rarely been updated, an...
Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
This 1-hour program provides a comprehensive exploration of the ethical and compliance challenges in...
This session will provide an in-depth exploration of the legal doctrine of veil piercing as it appli...
Essential Updates! The faculty will discuss when and how secured and unsecured loan transactions may...
This session is designed to help compliance professionals and fintech partners better understand the...
The False Claims Act (FCA) remains the Federal Government's primary fraud fighting statute. Stemming...
Session 8 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Session 1 of 10 - Session 1 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation law...
This CLE webinar examines the landscape of AI litigation and strategies for addressing AI-related ev...