Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
In this second segment we will continue with our journey into the multiple elements of high-level ne...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...