Unless governed by statute or industry standards, duty of care in products liability and organizational negligence litigation is usually subjective opining by experts. Proving appropriate or negligent standard of care is typically endless debate and prejudiced opinions. For nearly two decades, the practice of conducting duty and standard of care investigations using trademarked Forensic Business Pathology® techniques has yielded a 96% success rate over more than 40 cases. Duty of care is determined by finding and citing compelling standards. Standard of care is determined by comparing the defendant’s actions to international standards of quality management. Opposing counsel has yet to produce effective rebuttal for Tom Taormina’s reports and depositions.
As artificial intelligence becomes the engine of the global economy, the value of "AI-ready" data ha...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This course provides a strategic roadmap for attorneys to transition from administrative burnout to ...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...