It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
As artificial intelligence becomes the engine of the global economy, the value of "AI-ready" data ha...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...