It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program reframes domestic violence through the lens of “intimate terrorism,” equipp...
Negotiations impact almost every aspect of your life when you have to deal with other people, be the...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
This CLE program, “Your Most Powerful Trial Tool Isn’t What You Say—It’s How...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...