It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course provides a strategic roadmap for attorneys to transition from administrative burnout to ...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
This dynamic and compelling presentation explores how chronic stress, sleep deprivation, and substan...