It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...