It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...