It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...
AI tops the news seemingly every day. The technology is growing in use and application as lawyers, c...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
As lawyers, time is our most finite resource. We have duties to our clients to ensure that their mat...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...