It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...