It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...