It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-worl...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...