It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program reframes domestic violence through the lens of “intimate terrorism,” equipp...
This CLE program, “Your Most Powerful Trial Tool Isn’t What You Say—It’s How...
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...