It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-worl...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...