It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-worl...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...