It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...