It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...