It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Advanced Negotiation Strategies for Lawyers explores the psychology and strategy behind successful l...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...