It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...