It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
This is a comprehensive continuing legal education program designed exclusively for personal injury ...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...