It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...