It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
The program will cover the key issues for lawyer leaving government employment including the nuances...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...