It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...