It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
When the investigation concludes, the discipline is issued, and the file is closed, most organizatio...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
Advanced Negotiation Strategies for Lawyers explores the psychology and strategy behind successful l...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...