It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
This one-hour program will look at the key differences in policies available in the marketplace, dif...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
Join Steve Herman on December 8, 2025, for "Maintaining Ethical Standards: Essential Strategies for ...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Addressing the sensitive subjects of incapacity, death and health care are not either seamless or pa...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Generative AI is transforming how lawyers work, but it’s also raising new ethical and practica...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...