It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...