It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...