It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...