It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...