It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...