It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...