It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...