It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Addressing the sensitive subjects of incapacity, death and health care are not either seamless or pa...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
Generative AI is transforming how lawyers work, but it’s also raising new ethical and practica...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...
Attorneys have begun to experience what can happen when safe, ethical and legal use of AI is not ado...
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...