It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Addressing the sensitive subjects of incapacity, death and health care are not either seamless or pa...
We are at that time again. Resolution time. Or maybe they’re already nothing more than another...
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
As the Holiday Season is upon us, the widely known “12 Days of Christmas” comes to mind ...
Join Steve Herman on December 8, 2025, for "Maintaining Ethical Standards: Essential Strategies for ...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...