It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...