It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...