It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...