It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...