It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...