It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...