It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
As lawyers, time is our most finite resource. We have duties to our clients to ensure that their mat...
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
MODERATED- I’m ok. I can work this out for myself. I’m not like a “real” ...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
MODERATED-Session 3 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...