It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
This program reframes domestic violence through the lens of “intimate terrorism,” equipp...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...