It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...