It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
In 2016, the term “materiality” as it relates to the False Claims Act made a splash in t...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Established in 1992, the 340B Drug Pricing Program has many nuances and applications to different si...