It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
In this program, we will cover the purposes of Shareholders’ Agreements and the types of share...
This CLE will focus on running a remote law practice with emphasis on the following: • B...
Section 240 of New York State Labor Law, also known as “Scaffolding Law,” protects the r...
This course is designed to alert patent practitioners with the PTO rules on the “Duty of Discl...
This program will discuss who should be involved in an OSHA inspection, strategies when dealing with...
When we think of criminal antitrust enforcement, we often think of monopolies and widespread price-f...
This webinar will guide attorneys on two landmark federal civil rights legislation for nursing mothe...
Policyholders routinely look to general liability insurance for all manner of claims that do not fal...
This program will provide a detailed look at a variety of liens the practitioner may encounter while...
Depositions are the phase of civil litigation offering the greatest incentive and opportunity for un...