It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...