It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
The program will cover the key issues for lawyer leaving government employment including the nuances...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...