It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...