It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...