It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
The program will cover the key issues for lawyer leaving government employment including the nuances...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...