It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...