It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This is a comprehensive continuing legal education program designed exclusively for personal injury ...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...