It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The program objective is to provide the basis of US sanctions, including overview on enforcing agenc...
The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) is a US law that fights money laundering and other financial crimes. BSA ...
This session is designed to help compliance professionals and fintech partners better understand the...
This presentation addresses the unique challenges of shareholder disputes in small businesses, often...
In this seminar, we explore how attorneys can take command of difficult negotiations by blending str...
This session provides a foundational understanding of the rules and regulations governing ACH (Autom...
Session 8 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Intangible assets make up 84 percent of the value of the S&P 500, up from 17 percent in 1975. Wi...
With the Trump administration and Congress taking an innovate not regulate approach to consumer prot...
Unlike its counterpart on the privacy side, the HIPAA Security Rule has only rarely been updated, an...