It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years,...
This course will cover fundamental aspects of state telehealth laws and regulations. Attendees will ...
Our panelists will review your deposition strategy in personal injury cases from primarily the plain...
Chances are high that you or a buddy lawyer will have a serious medical crisis by age 55. Get ready ...
Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Are you as knowledgeable in the Fair Lending regulations? Do you know how they pertain to your role ...
This program provides practical guidance for trial attorneys on how artificial intelligence can be l...
This course will address the extent to which implicit bias may be hard-wired into our brains, driven...
With the Trump administration and Congress taking an innovate not regulate approach to consumer prot...
Intangible assets make up 84 percent of the value of the S&P 500, up from 17 percent in 1975. Wi...