It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
MODERATED-This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involving multijurisdictional practice and ...
MODERATED-Session 8 of 10 -Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 5...
MODERATED-Part 2 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
MODERATED - Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
MODERATED - Session 1 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
MODERATED-Part 1 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...