It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
This attorney-focused training provides deeper insight into GAAP’s framework and its legal app...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This timely program will help make sense of a legal landscape in flux, as the presenter explains the...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
This course introduces attorneys to the core principles of GAAP and the legal significance of standa...
The CLE program expands on the artistic techniques that make stories resonate, including tempo, sens...