It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
This dynamic and compelling presentation explores how chronic stress, sleep deprivation, and substan...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...