It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...