It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...