It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...