It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...