It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...