It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...