It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
During this presentation, you will learn about the regulations and caselaw controlling claims and re...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...