It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...