It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...