It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
The program will cover the key issues for lawyer leaving government employment including the nuances...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...