It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...