It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Financial crimes continue to proliferate, on a global basis. Criminals need to find ways to “l...
Our panelists will review your deposition strategy in personal injury cases from primarily the plain...
Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
This webinar will focus on the background of Electronic Fund Transfers Act, as well as recent develo...
This session provides a practical overview of bank fraud, helping participants identify common fraud...
In this riveting update to her original program, Executive Director of Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers...
This program provides practical guidance for trial attorneys on how artificial intelligence can be l...
This course will address the extent to which implicit bias may be hard-wired into our brains, driven...
This program will address how the practice of law impacts lawyers’ well-being, and how lawyers...
Permission to Pivot: Ethics, Well-Being, and Redefining Your Legal Career examines the intersection ...