It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This course provides a strategic roadmap for attorneys to transition from administrative burnout to ...
Attorneys and law firms are well known vectors for money laundering risk. Banks regularly labe...