It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Cybercriminals increasingly target law firms, attorneys, legal staff, and their clients through soph...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
Advanced Negotiation Strategies for Lawyers explores the psychology and strategy behind successful l...