It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
As law firms increasingly transition from paper-based disbursements to electronic payment systems&md...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
In this second segment we will continue with our journey into the multiple elements of high-level ne...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...