It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...