It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...