It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...