It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This continuing legal education (CLE) program highlights the intersection of lawyer wellness, alcoho...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This dynamic and compelling presentation explores how chronic stress, sleep deprivation, and substan...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...