It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...