It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
We are at that time again. Resolution time. Or maybe they’re already nothing more than another...
MODERATED-Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...