It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
This program explains the architecture of storytelling in the courtroom, using narrative arc, rhythm...
As lawyers, time is our most finite resource. We have duties to our clients to ensure that their mat...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...