It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...