It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Attorneys and law firms are well known vectors for money laundering risk. Banks regularly labe...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...