It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program addresses a gap no standard ethics CLE reaches: the psychology of what happens inside t...
Abrasive or burned out? Overworked or uncivil? Zealous advocate or bully? The legal profession is c...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Trial Starts Now: Winning the Final Six Months provides a comprehensive guide to the critical tasks ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
For at least the last half-century, the success or failure of most litigations is determined by how ...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...