It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
AI tops the news seemingly every day. The technology is growing in use and application as lawyers, c...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...