It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...