It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...