It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...