It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Workplace investigations are now more complex, high-stakes, and scrutinized than ever before. Employ...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...