It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involved in leaving government practice for the priva...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
MODERATED-Part 1 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This comprehensive program synthesizes theatrical technique, psychology, communication theory, and t...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
This course provides attorneys with a detailed examination of Form 1120S, including legal considerat...
MODERATED-This CLE will discuss the critical issues relating to the use of social media and legal et...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...