It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...