It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This follow?on CLE builds on National Security & Data Privacy: Complying with the Bulk Data...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...