It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...