It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...