It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
This timely program will help make sense of a legal landscape in flux, as the presenter explains the...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
This CLE will cover the critical ethics issues involved in leaving government practice for the priva...
MODERATED-Session 6 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
MODERATED-Attorneys may offer a crucial role in discussing advance (end of life) care planning optio...