Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...