It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
2026 was a very important year when it comes to federal procurement developments, Artificial Intelli...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
This course is meant for lawyers of all levels and areas of practice, and in it, we will explore way...