It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...