It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...