It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The United States Constitution is one of the most influential legal documents in history, establishi...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Incorrect military records prevent active duty and reserve Soldiers, Airmen, Guardians, Marines, Sai...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Most lawyers are aware of the high-profile cases in which attorneys were sanctioned or otherwise dis...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...