It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years,...
In addition to the fears about Opening Statements and Closing Arguments that lawyers know about &nda...
Permission to Pivot: Ethics, Well-Being, and Redefining Your Legal Career examines the intersection ...
This program will explain the nuts and bolts of pursuing common claims against the federal governmen...
Social media is no longer optional for lawyers who want to build and sustain a thriving practice&mda...
In the fast-paced, ever-evolving legal landscape, lawyers must go beyond traditional litigation and ...
The course will begin by describing what Agentic AI is and how it differs from Generative AI; how it...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...