It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This is a comprehensive continuing legal education program designed exclusively for personal injury ...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...