It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-worl...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...