It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
If there is one word we continue to hear more than any other term as we continue to navigate through...