It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...