It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
This program reframes domestic violence through the lens of “intimate terrorism,” equipp...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
AI is impacting virtually every corner of practicing law. Increasing AI usage has revealed myriad ri...