It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Attorneys hopefully recognize that, like many other professionals, their lives are filled to the bri...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
This course provides a strategic roadmap for attorneys to transition from administrative burnout to ...