It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
Social media has become a critical marketing and customer engagement channel for legal firms, banks,...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...