It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...