It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
As artificial intelligence becomes the engine of the global economy, the value of "AI-ready" data ha...
This dynamic and compelling presentation explores how chronic stress, sleep deprivation, and substan...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...