It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Estate planning for LGBTQ+ clients and families formed through assisted reproductive technology requ...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...