It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...