It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...