It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This continuing legal education (CLE) webinar provides comprehensive update on work? place safety ma...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
As artificial intelligence becomes the engine of the global economy, the value of "AI-ready" data ha...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...