It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Insurance companies are interesting because they are beholden to the policy holder and to investors....
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...