It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
In 2016, the term “materiality” as it relates to the False Claims Act made a splash in t...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...