It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...