It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
Whistleblowing, Tax Fraud, and Government Gatekeeping is a one-hour continuing legal education cours...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
The course will explore new guidance concerning FCPA enforcement issued by the Trump Administration ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...