It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...