It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...