It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...