It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...