It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This CLE program, “Your Most Powerful Trial Tool Isn’t What You Say—It’s How...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...