It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
A litigator’s role is to shape how key decision-makers - judges, jurors, and opposing counsel ...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
As lawyers, time is our most finite resource. We have duties to our clients to ensure that their mat...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This attorney-focused training provides deeper insight into GAAP’s framework and its legal app...
Insurance companies are interesting because they are beholden to the policy holder and to investors....
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...