It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...