Exciting new series on “Voice, Body and Movement for Lawyers – How to connect with the jury and find Justice Through Dramatic Technique!”
Click here to find out more
It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
In an era of heightening geopolitical tension, the protection of sensitive personal data has moved f...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...