It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...