It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...
Lawyers often work with clients, colleagues, and opposing counsel who are navigating some of the har...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...
Use of artificial intelligence and other automated tools for performance and predictive analytics in...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
Philip A. Greenberg, Esq., who has been a litigator in the State and Federal Courts for 52 years, ha...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...