It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
In high-stakes, high-pressure environments like the legal field, even the most accomplished professi...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Whether from poor drafting, conflicting case law, or simply the amounts in dispute, certain key cont...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...