It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...