It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
AI tools are advancing faster than legal organizations can absorb them. This program examines why th...
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This course is meant for lawyers of all levels and areas of practice, and in it, we will explore way...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...
Class action waivers in arbitration agreements remain enforceable, but a decade of U.S. Supreme Cour...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...