It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-worl...
Recent court opinions, a lawsuit against OpenAI Foundation and OpenAI Group PBC aka ChatGPT for the ...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Many solo and small law firms think AI policies are something only bigger firms need. But AI is alre...