It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...