It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...