It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...