It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This timely program will help make sense of a legal landscape in flux, as the presenter explains the...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
A practical overview designed for attorneys new to financial reporting. The session connects GAAP co...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...