It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
The Aftermath of Scams and Cybercrime: A Practical Guide to Response and Recovery examines the immed...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...