It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
This course provides a roadmap for ethical AI integration in high-volume practices through real-worl...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...