It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
Attorneys and law firms are well known vectors for money laundering risk. Banks regularly labe...
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...