It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
AI tops the news seemingly every day. The technology is growing in use and application as lawyers, c...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...