It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
This program introduces psychosocial evaluations as a valuable tool in civil litigation, particularl...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...