It is early in the practice of law that one becomes familiar with Justice Sutherland’s words in Berger v. United States: 293, US 78, 88 (1935). Changing the tense somewhat, prosecutors and law enforcement officials generally could be counted, he opined as “ministers of justice”, not striking foul blows, interested in doing justice and with a goal of just not winning. This case was often cited by courts content on the blanket acceptance (but not so much now) of a law enforcement team that Justice Sutherland believed took the moral high ground. Join Jay Goldberg as he discusses multiple cases involving the justice needed to end police trickery and deceit.
This session provides an in-depth examination of the fiduciary duties that both minority and majorit...
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Two pivotal contractual provisions are indemnification and limitations on liability. Yet, these two ...
This 1-hour program provides a comprehensive exploration of the ethical and compliance challenges in...
Permission to Pivot: Ethics, Well-Being, and Redefining Your Legal Career examines the intersection ...
Session 6 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years,...
A variety of types of cases require an understanding of anatomy. Equally, cases require the utilizat...
Balance billing in healthcare, especially in relation to Government Programs poses a significant ris...
Session 4 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...