Giuliani and ‘Throwing a Fake’: How the Ethics Rules Govern Misleading Conduct

07 Dec , 2021

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

In a recently released transcript, Rudy Giuliani told federal agents it was permissible to “throw a fake” during an electoral campaign. Just weeks before that transcript became public, Giuliani was suspended from the practice of law in New York for baselessly asserting that thousands of felons and dead people voted during the 2020 presidential election and that Georgia voting machines had been manipulated. 

This program will examine the ethics rules implicated by Giuliani’s recent conduct—ABA Rules 1.2, 3.3, 4.1, and 8.4—and provide guidance on how to avoid suffering Rudy’s fate.

 

To register for the upcoming live webinar, please Click Here

More Webcasts

Trade Agreements Act...

This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...

Labor Law Compliance...

Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...

Export Controls Comp...

What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...

False Claims Act...

Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...

Sexual Orientation A...

This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...

Expert Testimony in ...

This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...

Artificial Intellige...

Join us for Part 2 of a program tailored for attorneys seeking a better understanding of the ongoing...

U Visa Petitions: Le...

This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...

Ethical Billing in t...

Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...

DEI - Legal or Illeg...

Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...