Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program examines the complex intersection of criminal convictions and immigration law under the...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Many law firms now rely on AI?driven research, drafting, and workflow tools without fully understand...
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...