Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
This one-hour CLE program examines the impact of implicit and systemic bias within the legal profess...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...