Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Separation of Powers in United States and Israel from a Perspective of the Ongoing Debates in Both C...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
This presentation serves as a critical follow-up to the June 12, 2026, session on PTAB Discretionary...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...