Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
While it’s true that the quote, “Let’s kill all the lawyers” came from the s...
Would you like to increase your client base but don’t know where to begin? Do you want to acti...
Who ever thought that Fred Astaire was the Patron Saint of direct examination? In direct examination...
This program will explain lawyers’ supervisory duties during and after the client intake proce...
Judge Katherine Forrest will discuss the potential for generative AI, including large language model...
Wage and hour exposures continue to expand, in both frequency and damages. Yet most Employment Pract...
This presentation picks up where part 1 leaves off with impeachment by inconsistent statement and om...
Intellectual Property Lawyers are specialists in their own right—because patent and trademark ...
This program provides an overview of e-discovery, relevant ABA Model Rules for E-Discovery (Rules 1....
Because the hype is real. Generative AI will disrupt virtually every industry throughout the world. ...