Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
Advanced Negotiation Strategies for Lawyers explores the psychology and strategy behind successful l...
Perfectionism is often rewarded in the legal profession. It drives attention to detail, thorough pre...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...