Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
Between 1986 and now, the U.S. Government collected approximately $85 billion from Federal Contracto...
During this presentation, you will learn about the regulations and caselaw controlling claims and re...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...