Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...