Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Artificial intelligence is already reshaping legal practice, from research and drafting to litigatio...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...