Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
In this seminar, we will talk about the process of taking a deposition, why you should (or should no...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...