Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
During this presentation, you will learn about the regulations and caselaw controlling claims and re...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This program provides immigration attorneys with a structured and strategic approach to developing e...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...