Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Many lawyers may not fully understand the Bar rules and ethical considerations regarding client repr...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...