Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
Two pivotal contractual provisions are indemnification and limitations on liability. Yet, these two ...
Permission to Pivot: Ethics, Well-Being, and Redefining Your Legal Career examines the intersection ...
As technology advances, the manipulation of digital content has become more sophisticated and access...
Our panelists will review your deposition strategy in personal injury cases from primarily the plain...
"I think he drinks too much - but he's my boss!" “She's the firm's rainmaker, but something i...
A variety of types of cases require an understanding of anatomy. Equally, cases require the utilizat...
Decision making capacity and professional responsibility should be at the top of every attorney's li...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The course will begin by describing what Agentic AI is and how it differs from Generative AI; how it...