Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
This program focuses on asylum claims based on sexual orientation, addressing the unique clinical, c...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...