Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Learn about the latest trends in Federal Suspension and Debarments. This presentation will assist yo...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This program provides a detailed examination of the Black Market Peso Exchange (BMPE), one of the mo...