Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Generative AI is transforming how lawyers work, but it’s also raising new ethical and practica...
This Continuing Legal Education presentation covers electronic discovery and the related ethical dut...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
We are at that time again. Resolution time. Or maybe they’re already nothing more than another...
Dave Place, Esq., Founder of The Place Firm, will present a CLE providing practical tips to empower ...
MODERATED - Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...