Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...