Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
MODERATED-Part 1 of 2 - In this presentation, I will discuss strategies for cross-examining expert w...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
MODERATED-Session 3 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
MODERATED-Session 6 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
MODERATED - Session 2 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for ove...
MODERATED-Session 10 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over...
Addressing the sensitive subjects of incapacity, death and health care are not either seamless or pa...