Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
Attorneys will receive a comparative analysis of GAAP and IFRS with emphasis on cross-border legal c...
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Attorneys and law firms are well known vectors for money laundering risk. Banks regularly labe...