Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
In this course, Dr. Carlson will present a broad overview of what scientific research has discovered...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
As artificial intelligence becomes the engine of the global economy, the value of "AI-ready" data ha...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
This course breaks down GAAP’s ten foundational principles and explores their compliance impli...