Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
MODERATED-Session 6 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
MODERATED-Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
A practical overview designed for attorneys new to financial reporting. The session connects GAAP co...
MODERATED-Attorneys may offer a crucial role in discussing advance (end of life) care planning optio...