Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This program will discuss how to design and implement legally sound diversity, equity, and inclusion...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Turn decades of client relationships into lasting equity. This practical CLE shows attorneys how to ...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Data privacy remains one of the most rapid areas of growth in the class action space. Plaintiffs con...