Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
Food, sex, exercise – all may involve a variety of commonly enjoyed experiences that are healt...
Decision making capacity and professional responsibility should be at the top of every attorney's li...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Join Steve Herman on December 8, 2025, for "Maintaining Ethical Standards: Essential Strategies for ...
Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 50 years, ...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
In this presentation, Vanessa Terzian uses examples from actual client documents to demonstrate comm...
This program will cover the sources from which practitioners can gather documents, witnesses, and ot...
In today’s fast-evolving digital landscape, data privacy is no longer just a compliance checkb...