Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
Scam typologies help legal professionals by providing a framework to understand, identify, and preve...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...