Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This program provides trial attorneys with a thorough grounding in the three principal currency repo...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
This program examines the legal standards and factors courts throughout the United States apply when...
During this course you will learn about the Federal Firearm Rights Restoration program and the Feder...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
Class action litigation continues to expand in both number of filings and monetary exposure, with se...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
I was wrongfully separated from the military and I will get no military pay and disability retiremen...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...