Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, happen. Disasters can impact the practice of law and, among o...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
ChatGPT is rapidly entering law firm workflows, including drafting, summarizing, brainstorming, lega...