Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
The value of diversity has been researched extensively for its impact on various industries, includi...
Part II builds on the foundation established in Part I by examining how classical rhetorical styles ...
Different situations call for different tactics. Sometimes, the parties are both amenable to seeking...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
MODERATED-Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
As lawyers, time is our most finite resource. We have duties to our clients to ensure that their mat...