Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
MODERATED-Session 7 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
The always idiosyncratic Nassim Taleb likes to say, “Nothing is more permanent than ‘tem...
The Civil RICO framework allows individuals and businesses to pursue legal action for damages from a...
For decades, the Rule of Two in government contracting required federal agencies to set aside contra...
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Attorneys navigating today’s litigation landscape face growing challenges in identifying, pres...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
MODERATED-Attorneys may offer a crucial role in discussing advance (end of life) care planning optio...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...