Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
This 60-minute session gives you a practical operating system for the mental side of legal work: how...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...