Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
“Everyone tells me I’m doing a great job. My clients, my colleagues, my family. Wh...
Learn about the best strategies and tactics to file bid protests at the agency level, U.S. Governmen...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
This program, conducted by a seasoned litigation and trial lawyer, will emphasize what litigators ca...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...