Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Abrasive or burned out? Overworked or uncivil? Zealous advocate or bully? The legal profession is c...
"Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law" (updated through 2026), is a 50-slide primer desig...
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
New York City’s new Non-Primary Residence Property Surcharge—commonly known as the pied-...
Adverse and derogatory information often has devastating effects on a contractor's ability to win co...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
The Twelfth Juror: Lessons on Jury Selection from a Trial Lawyer’s Novel and a Trial Consultan...