Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
Part I introduces the foundational principles of cross?examination, explaining how lawyers must meth...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
This program focuses on overcoming the inner critic—the perfectionist, self?doubting voice tha...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...