Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
The CLE will cover the Ins and Outs of Internal Corporate Investigations, including: Back...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...