Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
Lawyers regularly communicate with clients who are angry, overwhelmed, frightened, unrealistic, or d...
U.S. businesses providing online services that are used by minors face a rapidly evolving patchwork ...
Discussion of religion and reasonable accommodation in the workplace. Thanks to the United States Su...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...