Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
The CLE program expands on the artistic techniques that make stories resonate, including tempo, sens...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Whether the Federal Government or individual State Governments, fraud enforcement, especially in hea...
Dave Place, Esq., Founder of The Place Firm, will present a CLE providing practical tips to empower ...
For decades, the Rule of Two in government contracting required federal agencies to set aside contra...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...