Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
AI, an innovative technology that was once a supporting act for digital transformation, business str...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
This program provides immigration attorneys with an in-depth understanding of competency issues in r...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of the name, image, and likeness (...
For most new attorneys, learning how to frame an oral argument can be a daunting task. L...
Electronic information is a common feature of criminal investigations and prosecutions, both federal...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...