Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
During this course you will take a deep dive into federal bid protest litigation at the U.S. Court o...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
The practice of law places legal professionals under extraordinary and often chronic stress, making ...
“Is Your Voice Biometric Data? BIPA, AI and the New Era of Voiceprint Litigation” looks ...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Join us for this presentation to learn about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit litig...
This program examines the scope, jurisdiction, and exceptions to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), ...
Class action litigation presents significant legal and business challenges for employers and corpora...
Conducting an internal investigation that is incisive, effective and legally compliant is tough enou...
Business disputes involving closely held companies, partnerships, shareholders, and informal busines...