Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of employment law, arbitration agreements have become a cornerston...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...
Boundaries and Burnout: The Hidden Crisis in Law is a 60-minute California MCLE Competence Credit pr...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Part 2 - This program will continue the discussion from Part 1 focusing specifically on cross?examin...
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...