Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Tailored for attorneys, this training demystifies EBITDA and contrasts it with GAAP- and IFRS-based ...
This course provides a strategic roadmap for attorneys to transition from administrative burnout to ...
This presentation provides an overview of copyright law particularly as it applies to music. The pre...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This attorney-focused program reviews upcoming Nacha rule changes for 2026 with emphasis on legal ob...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...