Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) and other digital-native structures have moved from ni...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
In Part 2, Mr. Kornblum will again use segments from the movies to teach pre-trial and trial tactics...
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...
Open-source AI models have gone from niche developer tools to enterprise essentials almost overnight...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...