Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Modern mediation increasingly brings together parties, counsel, and neutrals across a broad range of...
This program provides attorneys with a foundational understanding of derivatives and their role in m...
This CLE course will provide critical insight to counsel for insurers facing bad faith claims on how...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
AI agents — autonomous systems capable of planning, deciding, and acting independently across ...
This dynamic CLE presentation challenges trial lawyers to rethink everything they were taught about ...
Have you felt overwhelmed by the amount of technology available to family lawyers? We'll get to know...