Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
This course will provide an update for practitioners on U.S. federal employment law, exploring the T...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
The Protections and Limits of the First Amendment when it comes to Expressive Conduct. This PowerPoi...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
The landscape of global finance is undergoing a seismic shift as traditional assets migrate to the b...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) remains one of the most important consumer protection...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...