Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
My contract was terminated and the contracting officer did not pay my invoices – what can I do...
This course examines the latest legal and compliance developments in the artificial intelligence (AI...
This course analyzes federal contractor cyber security obligations under the Federal Acquisition Reg...
What are the left and rights limits, penalties, and best practices for export controls under Interna...
During this course, we will go over your rights under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Priv...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...