Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Effective data privacy and artificial intelligence governance programs do not happen by accident. Th...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Many solo and small law firms think AI policies are something only bigger firms need. But AI is alre...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
If there is one word we heard during our journey through the pandemic and continue to hear more than...