Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
United States patent law and the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s patent-related gu...
This program will address some of the most common intellectual property (IP) issues that arise in co...
Part 1 - This program focuses specifically on cross?examining expert witnesses, whose credentials an...
Aligning Your Legal Career with Your Values, explores the profound impact of values alignment on ind...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
‘A Lawyer’s Guide To Mental Fitness’ is a seminar designed to equip professionals ...
Review the basic software concepts and effective uses of generative AI, prompting strategies, and me...