Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
AI agents and generative AI tools are rapidly entering law firm workflows, including legal research,...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This interactive course is designed to equip legal professionals with the knowledge, tools, and stra...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Trademark doctrine was built for a marketplace that no longer exists, leaving practitioners to litig...