Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
There are countless trial skill CLEs that will teach you the basics of trial strategies. This CLE is...
This program is geared towards lawyers, experts, commercial property owners, and others in the envir...
This program provides attorneys with a practical examination of how legal, regulatory, and liability...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
Class action litigation continues to evolve rapidly in response to an innovative plaintiffs’ b...
Most legal professionals are operating in survival mode whether they realize it or not. Not crisis-l...
This course analyzes federal contractor obligations under the Trade Agreements Act. Learn how to ens...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
State attorneys general continue to play a central and increasingly aggressive role in consumer prot...