Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This program provides a comprehensive analysis of the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause as reshap...
This Shakespeare?inspired program illustrates how Shakespearean technique can enrich courtroom advoc...
Large World Models (LWMs)— the next generation of AI systems capable of generating...
Resilience in the Workplace, delves into the critical importance of resilience in navigating the cha...
Navigating Stress and Trauma in the Legal Profession, explores the unique challenges faced by legal ...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
Attorneys are judged every time they speak—in client meetings, depositions, hearings, negotiat...