Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
“Maybe I drink more than I should, but it isn’t affecting my life-I’m ‘High-...
This timely program will help make sense of a legal landscape in flux, as the presenter explains the...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
This Continuing Legal Education presentation covers electronic discovery and the related ethical dut...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
The CLE program expands on the artistic techniques that make stories resonate, including tempo, sens...
The “Chaptering Your Cross” program explains how dividing a cross?examination into clear...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...