Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
This attorney-focused training provides deeper insight into GAAP’s framework and its legal app...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...
A practical overview designed for attorneys new to financial reporting. The session connects GAAP co...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
MODERATED-Session 8 of 10 -Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over 5...
AI tops the news seemingly every day. The technology is growing in use and application as lawyers, c...
Part 2 dives deeper into advanced cross?examination techniques, teaching attorneys how to maintain c...
Synthetic identity fraud creates a significant legal and compliance challenge for professionals by c...