Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Evidence Demystified Part 1 introduces core evidentiary principles, including relevance, admissibili...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
This course clarifies the distinction between profit and cash flow from a legal perspective. Attorne...
In “Choosing the Right Business Entity,” I will walk through the issues that matter most...
This ethics program examines common, but often avoidable, professional responsibility mistakes that ...
This session highlights the legal and compliance implications of divergences between GAAP and IFRS. ...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
This CLE session introduces attorneys to budgeting and forecasting concepts used in corporate planni...
This program explores listening as a foundational yet under-taught lawyering skill that directly imp...