Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
MODERATED-Session 9 of 10 - Mr. Kornblum, a highly experienced trial and litigation lawyer for over ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
Part 2 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...
MODERATED- I’m ok. I can work this out for myself. I’m not like a “real” ...
This Continuing Legal Education presentation covers electronic discovery and the related ethical dut...
Evidence Demystified Part 2 covers key concepts in the law of evidence, focusing on witnesses, credi...
Different situations call for different tactics. Sometimes, the parties are both amenable to seeking...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
Part 1 of 2 - Lawyers at all levels of experience and even sophisticated law firms and general couns...