Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
The filing of multiple RICO complaints in federal courts in New York State against plaintiffs’...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...
Loneliness isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a silent epidemic in the legal profession t...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
Many solo and small law firms assume AI governance is something only large firms need. It is not. AI...
This program examines critical 2025-2026 developments in patent eligibility for software and AI inve...
This program examines listening as an active, strategic trial advocacy skill rather than a passive c...
This program provides a comprehensive and practice-oriented framework for integrating criminal mitig...
This program provides attorneys with a practical and ethical framework for understanding and respons...
Contracting with the Federal Government is not like a business deal between two companies or a contr...