Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
Mary Beth O'Connor will describe her personal history of 20 years of drug use and 30+ years of sobri...
You’ve arranged to speak with a reporter. Do you know how to deliver insights that are memorab...
Bias and discrimination continue to shape workplace dynamics, legal practice, and professional respo...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
This program examines the strategy and artistry of closing argument, positioning it as a lawyer&rsqu...
This CLE program examines attorneys’ ethical duties in managing electronically stored informat...
This companion program to Part 1 goes deeper into the rhetorical power of Shakespeare, emphasizing h...
This course introduces attorneys to the core principles of GAAP and the legal significance of standa...
Law firms across the country are rethinking traditional staffing models to stay competitive, reduce ...
Designed for attorneys without formal accounting training, this course provides a clear, practical f...