Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This course on trade secrets litigation provides real-world best practices through all key stages of...
Section 337 provides powerful, efficient and rapid remedies for a wide range of unfair methods of co...
This program provides a practical roadmap to mastering every stage of the discovery process in civil...
Every trial lawyer has experienced it: the inner critic before opening statements, the surge of ange...
Thinking Like a Lawyer, Prompting Like a Pro: Prompting Ethically, Securely, and Safely explores how...
In 1968, English rock band The Zombies released their psychedelic counterculture anthem, “Time...
Objections are among the most powerful — and most misunderstood — tools in a trial lawye...
As the largest purchaser of goods and services in the world, the United States Government requires f...
Lawyers lose hundreds of billable and operational hours every year to poorly managed meetings. Unfoc...
During this course, you will learn about best practices and strategies for retaining intellectual pr...