Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
This CLE program covers the most recent changes affecting IRS information reporting, with emphasis o...
Tracking and using consumer’s data without consent is a high stakes game. From class actions t...
The False Claims Act continues to be the federal Government’s number one fraud fighting tool. ...
This presentation explores courtroom staging—how movement, spatial awareness, posture, and pre...
This presentation teaches attorneys how to deliver memorized text—especially openings and clos...
The statistics are compelling and clearly indicate that 1 out of 3 attorneys will likely have a need...
This advanced CLE dives into complex GAAP topics relevant to attorneys advising corporate, regulator...
Protect clients and yourself by knowing some of the more common ethical issues that can affect your ...
The direct examination presentation outlines how attorneys can elicit truthful, credible testimony w...
This presentation examines how “sense memory,” a core acting technique, can help lawyers...