Courts and parties have been dealing with discovery overuse for decades. The advisory committee notes to both the 1983 and 2015 revisions to Rule 26 reference the problem of over-discovery and encourage judges to be more aggressive in identifying and discouraging discovery overuse. Have courts been more aggressive in discouraging discovery overuse? Have parties since the 2015 revisions to Rule 26 been inclined to follow Rule 1’s instruction to employ the Federal Rules to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action?
This webinar will review recent case opinions in which courts have independently revised overbroad discovery. The presenters will also provide their views on relevance and proportionality considerations in discovery and assessing the risk of court revisions to discovery requests.
The “Preventing Access to U.S. Sensitive Personal Data and Government-Related Data by Countrie...
This program addresses the critical intersection of criminal and immigration law, focusing on how mi...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
This course will provide a detailed overview of the Medicare Secondary Payer act as well as provide ...
This program examines mitigation strategies for white-collar defendants in the post-Booker sentencin...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
Effective representation depends on trust, communication, and responsiveness, yet these can break do...
This program examines the role of psychosocial evaluations in spousal abuse-based immigration petiti...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in mediat...
Explore the transformative potential of generative AI in modern litigation. “Generative AI for...