The civil jury has served as a pivotal institution in the United States’ social and constitutional structure since the founding. Despite this foundation, however, the majority of civil disputes today are resolved not by laypeople serving as jurors but through private and publicly funded settlement and arbitration proceedings. The result is a tragic loss of the demonstrable sociopolitical benefits of jury service.
With these points in mind, this program focuses on reforms for reviving the civil jury as an institution, emphasizing that efforts must focus on removing barriers to jury access and enhancing fair and accurate jury fact-finding.
Specifically, we offer the following research-based proposals:
1. Return to a jury-trial default rule;
2. Eliminate legislation capping the jury’s damage-setting authority;
3. Expand the sue of innovative procedural tracks, such as expended jury trial projects;
4. Ensure that juries represent the communities form which they are drawn;
5. Require the use of twelve-person civil juries;
6. Adopt active jury reforms.
Recent studies have shown that there has been a dramatic increase in impairment due to alcoholism, a...
This program examines the strategic use of expert testimony in immigration court proceedings. Partic...
Protect your practice from the ethical vulnerabilities of AI by mastering Model Rules 1.1 and 1.5. T...
The Federal Tort Claims Act is the way that the federal government is sued for negligence. There are...
This program explores the impact of complex trauma on criminal defendants through a developmental an...
This program provides a comprehensive framework for integrating Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD...
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to impact legal firms and organizations worl...
This program will address the ethical obligations of Lawyer Advocates representing clients in arbitr...
This program provides attorneys with a comprehensive framework for incorporating psychosocial evalua...
Prior to the Supreme Court’s 2023 affirmative action decision, some predicted that this ruling...