Celesq® Programs

Inequitable Conduct 2.0 in Patent Prosecution and Litigation, from the Celesq®-West IP Master Series

2009 has seen at least two decisions that deal with Inequitable Conduct. Join Leigh Martinson, Esq., a partner in McDermott Will & Emery LLP, as he reviews Exergen v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Larson Manufacturing v. Aluminart Products and Chamberdoor Industries, and suggests strategies for (a) pleading Inequitable Conduct under the new standard, and (b) for patent prosecutors, for fending off charges of Inequitable Conduct. Our presenter also discusses the ideas found in the ABA IPL Section's Resolution on Inequitable Conduct.

Available in States

• Arizona
• California
• Colorado Eligible
• Georgia
• Missouri
• New Jersey Eligible
• New York
• Texas Self Study

Program Categories

• California Participatory MCLE Programs
• Corporate and Commercial Law
• In-House Counsel
• Intellectual Property Law
• Litigation & Litigation Skills
• New York Accredited
• Patent Law
• Regulatory and Administrative Law

PROGRAM CREDITS

• Areas of Professional Practice : 1 Credit
• 1 General CLE credit : 1 Credit