Celesq® Programs

Mixed Signals? The Quon and Stengart Decisions—What Do they Mean for the Corporate Workplace?

Expired
Program Number
2065
Program Date
2010-07-15
CLE Credits
2

For years, employers took for granted that it is legal to monitor an employee's every keystroke on work-issued computers, phones and PDAs. With the recent surge in employee privacy claims, some state and federal courts have sided with the employee, particularly where the electronic activity involves personal, rather than business-related, matters. Join Heather Egan Sussman and Stephen Erf, partners at McDermott Will & Emery LLP, who explain the recent developments in the legal framework for this privacy debate and what it means for the American workplace, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Quon, in which the Court unanimously ruled that the employer could lawfully review personal messages sent on work pagers, and the New Jersey Supreme Court in Stengart, in which the Court held that an employer improperly accessed an employee’s private email messages. The program includes practical advice about when and to what extent employers can use employees' electronic activities to make employment-related decisions like hiring and firing and best practices for implementing lawful workplace policies in light of the changing legal landscape.

Available in States

  • Arizona
  • California
  • Colorado Eligible
  • Colorado Homestudy
  • Georgia
  • Missouri
  • New Jersey Eligible
  • New York
  • Texas Self Study

Program Categories

  • California Participatory MCLE Programs
  • Computer, Internet & E-Commerce Law
  • Corporate and Commercial Law
  • Data Security and Outsourcing
  • Employment & Labor Law
  • Federal Courts
  • In-House Counsel
  • New York Accredited
  • Privacy Law
  • Regulatory and Administrative Law
  • State Specific Programs

PROGRAM CREDITS

  • Areas of Professional Practice : 1 Credit
  • 1 General CLE credit : 1 Credit