In recent decisions such as Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft and Cornell v. Hewlett-Packard, courts have taken on the much criticized methodologies used to award damages in patent cases and may have rendered even more unlikely any action by an already-occupied Congress. The courts have sharply criticized and curtailed what they believed to be unwarranted awards based on impractical assumptions and unrealistic reasoning. More cases like this may be coming. Join us as Anthony F. Lo Cicero of Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP discusses the potential impact of these cases on the future of patent damages.