A discussion about the impact of the recent ruling in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Johnson v. NCAA, where the court denied the NCAA/several local college’s (Villanova, Drexel, Lasalle, Penn, Temple, Penn State, etc.) motion to dismiss and held that the complaint plausibly alleges that the students are employees of the colleges for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs are student athletes who engage in interscholastic athletic activity for their colleges and universities and allege that they are employees who should be paid for the time they spend related to those athletic activities. The webinar will discuss the case status (including the status of the interlocutory appeal), the court’s decision, how the case impacts student-athletes and universities, and the interplay between the case and NIL developments.
Two experienced practitioners in the areas of CFIUS and export controls (Stephen Heifetz and Jahna H...
The program will discuss experiences in the use of virtual on-line mediations and arbitrations since...
You’re at trial questioning a witness and the witness testifies differently than you expect. W...
The privilege rests on the need to know all that relates to the client’s reasons for seeking l...
The crypto and digital asset space remains a growing and complex sector due to legal restrictions, a...
When dealing with natural resource damages caused by contaminants released into the air, ground and/...
Life and work during the COVID pandemic have been challenging for many people, including legal profe...
This webinar will cover choice of law clauses in prenuptial agreements. When preparing a prenuptial ...
With spending on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare anticipated to skyrocket in t...
New York State’s 2022 budget made significant amendments to the state’s Brownfield Clean...