A discussion about the impact of the recent ruling in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Johnson v. NCAA, where the court denied the NCAA/several local college’s (Villanova, Drexel, Lasalle, Penn, Temple, Penn State, etc.) motion to dismiss and held that the complaint plausibly alleges that the students are employees of the colleges for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The plaintiffs are student athletes who engage in interscholastic athletic activity for their colleges and universities and allege that they are employees who should be paid for the time they spend related to those athletic activities. The webinar will discuss the case status (including the status of the interlocutory appeal), the court’s decision, how the case impacts student-athletes and universities, and the interplay between the case and NIL developments.
“Movement psychology” is a branch of psychology that emerged in the early twentieth cent...
Recent legislative developments may significantly impact the Franchisor- Franchisee relationship mor...
Part 2 in a 2-part series - Human expression has always fascinated me. In this presentation, I begin...
This program will cover the important (but often forgotten) professional responsibility and risk iss...
This program will discuss who should be involved in an OSHA inspection, strategies when dealing with...
Confidentiality is one of the most valuable – but misunderstood – benefits that internat...
This CLE presentation will empower attendees to: • Identify common issues and claims that pres...
This webinar will guide attorneys on two landmark federal civil rights legislation for nursing mothe...
COVID brought to light serious deficiencies in Long-Term care that existed long before the pandemic....
This lecture is prepared to assist the trial attorney in how to convince jurors that they should vot...