Is There a Middle Ground between Document Over-Preservation and Allegations of Spoliation? An Analysis for In-House and Corporate Counsel
Program Number: 2308
Program Date: 06/11/2013
Description
Although the general obligation to preserve documents and potential penalties for spoliation are clear, the scope of the required preservation is often unclear. As a result, a company that must decide how broadly to preserve often ends up going beyond its obligations, which can result in great expense and inconvenience. In this program of particular interest to in-house and corporate counsel, Carmen McLean, a partner at Jones Day, explores ways to minimize both over-preservation and exposure to spoliation allegations.
Available in states
Arizona, California, Colorado Eligible, Florida, Georgia, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey Eligible, New York, Texas Self Study
Credit Information
50 minute credit hour - 1.0 General CLE credit
60 minute credit hour - 1.0 General CLE credit
State Program Numbers
Program Categories
Corporate and Commercial Law
Federal Courts
Florida Eligible
In-House Counsel
Litigation & Litigation Skills
Skills
Presenters
Carmen McLean, Esq. Jones Day |
Carmen G. McLean, Esq. is a partner at Jones Day, resident in its Washington, D.C. office. She has significant experience in antitrust investigations and litigation, and counsels clients on electronic discovery issues, using her e-discovery knowledge and experience to advise clients subject to preservation or production obligations to design their response in a way that is defensible, but also minimizes associated costs. Ms. McLean, who has composed electronic discovery procedural manuals and other resources to assist major corporations on issues related to e-discovery, also designs and conducts training programs for law firm partners and associates, is a member of Jones Day's Electronic Discovery Management Team, and has served as a guest lecturer at Georgetown University Law Center. She was selected by The National Law Journal as a "Champion of the Legal Profession" in 2011. |
Categories
- Advertising
- Antitrust Law
- Arbitration & Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Asset Protection
- Bankruptcy Law & Creditor Rights
- California Participatory MCLE Programs
- Colorado Homestudy
- Communications and Media Law
- Computer, Internet & E-Commerce Law
- Constitutional Law
- Construction Law Series
- Copyright Law
- Corporate and Commercial Law
- Corporate and Securities Law
- Criminal Law & White Collar
- Criminal Practice & Procedure
- Data Security and Outsourcing
- Domestic Relations
- E-Discovery
- Elimination of Bias--Special ethics
- Employment & Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- Estate Planning
- Ethics & Professionalism
- Federal Courts
- Florida Eligible
- Green Technology
- Health Care Law
- In-House Counsel
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property Law
- International Law
- Law Practice Management
- Litigation & Litigation Skills
- Negligence, Malpractice & Personal Injury
- New York Accredited
- North Carolina
- Not Available for CLE Credit
- Oil & Gas Law
- Patent Law
- Privacy and Data Security
- Privacy Law
- Professional Development
- Real Estate
- Regulatory and Administrative Law
- Securities & Investing
- Skills
- State Specific Programs
- State Specific: CA (qualifies for Elimination of Bias)
- Substance Abuse & Bias
- Tanenbaum on Technology Law
- Taxation Law
- Technology Law
- Texas Participatory CLE Programs
- Trademark Law
